Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Downing Street parties: Met rejects call for No 10 party inquiry despite mea culpa

The Metropolitan Police was refusing last night to open an investigation into the Downing Street party as experts said that possible legal breaches could be complicated by the fact it took place at Boris Johnson’s home residence.

The Met said its stance had not changed despite the prime minister’s admission in parliament yesterday that he had attended the garden drinks on May 20, 2020.

The force appears to be determined to wait for the conclusion of a Cabinet Office inquiry before deciding whether a criminal investigation would be in the public interest.

Legal experts said that Johnson could swerve criminal culpability, however, because the party was held at his home address.

Adam Wagner, a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers in London, who specialises in pandemic legislation, said that at the time the only relevant law on gatherings was a ban on leaving home without a reasonable excuse.

Others who attended may have breached coronavirus rules but the matter is further complicated because it was their workplace rather than a public area, to which the law specifically related. There was guidance at the time that stipulated gatherings must be restricted to two people, except for a limited number of specific reasons. However, the guidance was never legally enforceable.

If it ultimately carries out an investigation, the Met will have to determine the nature of the gathering, which will require a close examination of Johnson’s claim that it was work-related.

It is understood that detectives are already in contact with the Cabinet Office, although it is unclear if evidence has been sent to Scotland Yard.

Amid the confusion, the Met has come under criticism from former senior officers who say its refusal to act is damaging public confidence.

Last night Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, called on the Met to investigate and said that the prime minister should be interviewed under caution. He said that the party was “almost certainly an illegal gathering” because it was not a work meeting, given those invited were asked to “bring your own booze”.

Davey said the Met should reassure the public “that there isn’t one rule for them and another for Boris Johnson” by announcing a full inquiry.

Wagner said that Johnson’s statement was carefully worded and “obviously lawyered”. He said he had “probably done enough” to avoid prosecution by saying he believed implicitly it was a work event and technically could be said to fall within the guidance.

Nonetheless, Wagner acknowledged that it was “a weak defence” and the garden event still appeared to have been a party. The fact that alcohol was involved meant that it was more than likely that the social distancing requirements would not have been followed, he said.

He said that Johnson’s admission in parliament could not be used against him thanks to a more than 300-year-old law. The Bill of Rights 1689 provides parliamentary privilege to comments made in chambers to guarantee freedom of speech for MPs and peers.

The Met has ruled out inquiries into alleged Covid breaches at No 10, saying that material in the public domain does not meet the evidential threshold and that the force does not retrospectively investigate coronavirus breaches.

Scotland Yard says that it has applied its enforcement approach throughout the pandemic to the general public and well known figures alike. It insists it has generally only intervened in cases in which people repeatedly broke the rules, such as the organisers of illegal raves.

Read more:
Downing Street parties: Met rejects call for No 10 party inquiry despite mea culpa

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!



Lowering VAT charges on fuel may be politically attractive but is not good news for those who will struggle the most, say leading tax...


An estimated 3 per cent of the workforce was signed off in late December and a fifth of businesses reported increased cancellations amid the...


Mark Zuckerberg could be forced to pay most British Facebook users about £50 each if a landmark legal action alleging that the site abused...


France has reopened its borders to British tourists after ministers in Paris eased restrictions on non-essential travel. From this morning, Britons travelling to the...


People struck down with the Omicron variant of the coronavirus are buying so much paracetamol that supplies are running low in many shops. Official...


Covid Passports are to be abandoned within days after Sajid Javid effectively killed off the policy. The health secretary has concluded that Covid-19 certification...

You May Also Like


Having a good Instagram marketing agency to back up your Instagram account is an absolute must going into the new year. With competition stronger...


Ivermectin, an existing drug against parasites including head lice, has had a checkered history when it comes to treating COVID-19. The bulk of studies...


Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder in the global population. Therefore, it is a problem that many people suffer or have suffered throughout...


As a traditionally rigid insurance industry becomes bogged down by antiquated processes and operations, a handful of industry leaders are seeking to shake things...

Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2021 SmartRetirementReport. All Rights Reserved.